Below is the abstract for “Confronting Indeterminacy and Bias in Child Protection Law,” available for download on SSRN.

The child protection legal system faces strong and growing demands for change following at least two critiques. First, child protection law is substantively indeterminate; it does not precisely prescribe when state agencies can intervene in family life and what that intervention should entail, thus granting wide discretion to child protection agencies and family courts. Second, by granting such discretion, the law permits race, class, sex, and other forms of bias to infect decisions and regulate low-income families and families of color.

This Article extends these critiques through a granular analysis of how indeterminacy at multiple decision points builds on itself. The law does not tether permissible interventions to specific types of maltreatment. Minor cases can lead to family separations and even terminations of parent-child relationships. Steps required for reunification can become unrelated to grounds for state intervention. States expend many resources to separate families after failing to spend similar amounts to preserve families.

A child protection reform legislative agenda has begun to emerge, but without comprehensively addressing the indeterminacy at the heart of the present legal structure. This Article argues a transformed system must include determinate substantive standards for various stages of child protection cases to limit the system’s scope and the potential for biased decision-making. The law should define neglect and abuse with precision, both to limit unnecessary state intervention and set maximum levels of state intervention based on the specific maltreatment at issue. The law should require states to spend as much money on helping families stay together as they would on maintaining children in foster care. State action to terminate the legal relationship between parents and children should be limited to situations in which any form of parent-child relationship is harmful to the child.

SHARE

Josh Gupta-Kagan

University of South Carolina School of Law

Josh Gupta-Kagan is a Professor of Law and specializes in legal issues affecting children and families, especially child protection and juvenile justice issues. Prior to joining the University of South Carolina faculty, he practiced for six years at the Children’s Law Center, a legal services organization in the District of Columbia devoted to a wide range of children’s legal issues. He represented children and family members in District of Columbia Family Court cases, and successfully advocated for various legislative reforms.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published.